WBXPress

RECTIFICATION OF THE HM INCREMENT AS UPGRADED TO H.S.

Home Forums Pay & Allowances RECTIFICATION OF THE HM INCREMENT AS UPGRADED TO H.S.

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #70094
    Anonymous
    Guest

    In Ropa 2009, there was a vital point- during 01-01-06 to 27-02-09, for the up gradation to H.S.,the H.M. of such schools, get an extra increment 3% and Rs. 200/- for their higher responsibility. But there was no clarification what will happened the cases the those HM.s, whose schools upgraded after 27/02/2009 ? A daily news says these near about 4000 HM(s) took an increment without the permission of finance department. So, their increment will be treated as overdrawn. It was a great confusion to us no doubt. But the circular has solved the problem. This is….

    #80566
    Anonymous
    Guest

    A.D.I. Asansol saidthat he has not received the circular till now.so he is unable to approve the increment. What is to be done?

    #80567
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Have any circular from d s e to d i of school for rectification of pay of h m of h s school after 27 .02.2015 ?

    #80568
    Anonymous
    Guest

    I have submitted the DSE ORDER above…..
    Thanks a lot.

    #82417
    Anonymous
    Guest

    Memo No. 1003-SE(S)/5P-129/12 Dt 04-Dec-2014 posted above by @mihiracharya has been withdrawn by Memo No. 292-st/ss-294/12 Dt. 22-03-2017
    Please see the attachment.

    #82487
    Anonymous
    Guest

    The DIS(SE)s’ has fixed the pay with an additional increment in case of up gradation after 27/02/09 by their order (Pay Fixation). And the HMs have drawn their salary with an additional increment as per their pay fixation. I think until further order will issue by the DIS (SE) for return the drawn increment, why the HMs’ will agree to return their salary? Is it possible to withdrawn the circular after execution? I think it may possible to withdrawn mentioning the date with effect from…( of course the date of order for withdrawn). And this date should not be from 28/02/ 2009. Then the HMs will must go the High Court, is not it? Thanks…

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.