HORROR OF SYSTEM ERROR!

Dear, donyi-polo,
No doubt it is a painful matter.
In the teaching process, medium of instruction is very important specially where it is mentioned . Who is not fluent to write, to speak, to read in Hindi , he did not ought to choose Hindi medium school. Language is there a great factor. A teacher may come to close of a student by their(student’s) spoken language. A teacher for the student, by the student, of the student.
How the SSC thinks, to be a teacher of Hindi medium school is enough to study only for 50 marks of Hindi in graduate level ?
From your description,”He is a bengali boy from a needy family living in a village in WB. He passed Madhyamik & H.S. from a bengali medium school under WB Board and, completed graduation and PG from Bihar”.
I want to say that the teacher has made a wrong to opted Hindi medium school certainly but the SSC ? Is SSC informed by the sufferer incumbent ?
M.C. of the school did not refuse/return the case to SSC. But why? In fear of the grants to be stop.
What about the D.I.of schools ? What is there opinion?
With due respect , I would like to draw attention of our authority to solve the problem heartily so that the incumbent may gets his salary with arrears as the earliest.

To Dr. Majumdar and Mr. Acharya,
I agree with both of you on some points. I find no objection to the approach of the teacher as he has done the right thing as per the provisions of rules. Every body has the right to establish himself/herself in the society through honest professions. In this case, this is the demerit of the rule makers who probably didn’t think of the loopholes of the system. I think there would not have been any problem if it is a bengali/english medium school because the number of applicants for teaching profession in such schools is plenty and, they have adequate knowledge in bengali and english because of inclusion of these language papers in Madhyamik and H.S. levels. And, attention is paid to these languages right from the lower level of education and therefore, the students find sufficient time to mould themselves. A language studied as the third subject in graduation level is much like a orphan. It may not be considered by SSC as much importance is not paid to such language course, especially when the paper itself carries nominal marks like 50. M.C. was in dilemma as it could neither ignore the interests of the victimised students nor could it dare to refer the case to D.I./ SSC in fear of losing the grant. SSC was to follow their own recruitment rules and, it did accordingly. That’s why the court issued order in favour of the teacher. It may be treated as an exception! Indeed, it has exposed the lacoonas of the system which need to be reviewed. The applicants must have any of the subjects like Bengali, Eng., Hindi, Oriya, Urdu, Santhali, Nepali as first or second language at Secondary or H.S. levels where due attention is paid to these subjects, helping the students to develop through knowledge.
Lastly, I appreciate the inteligence of Dr. Majumdar for assigning an appropriate caption (Horror of system error) to the case which is now an example to us. This catchy caption has made the topic more attractive and drawn our attention and, become a subject of discussion in teachers’ room.
With regards.