Relaxation of age for Madhyamik Pariksha
Home āŗ Forums āŗ Management āŗ Relaxation of age for Madhyamik Pariksha
- This topic is empty.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 29, 2012 at 3:48 pm #67834
Anonymous
InactiveFriends,
If a pupilās age (as per admission register) falls beyond the stipulated one (as per Boardās Norm) by 2/3 months; what may be the way to allow her/him for appearing at MP Exam?September 1, 2012 at 8:37 pm #73916InactiveTaking special permission from the board the student may be allowed.
September 2, 2012 at 12:46 pm #73926InactiveA lot of thanks
November 19, 2012 at 10:58 am #75410InactiveAs per the Boards Circular No. DS(E)/192/12 dated 30.08.2012 in relation to age of candidates for appearing at M.P. 2014 no Registration Certificate will be prepared if date of birth of candidate is beyond 31.10.1999. So, it appears that special permission may not be obtained for getting age relaxation:
/files/ ā¦ ik_Age.pdfNovember 23, 2012 at 3:35 pm #75566InactiveI think both of them are true. The word is āspeacialā is most important. Previously there was also same type of order, but the are a lot of example who got speacial permission. The why not now?
November 23, 2012 at 3:38 pm #75568InactiveOtherwise he/she will have to loss one year from his/her life.
November 24, 2012 at 9:09 am #75594InactiveDear Mr. Jana,
Both cannot be true simultaneously!
Can you pls upload the previous yearās Circular issued by WBBSE in year 2011, regarding age for appearing at the Madhymik Pariksha, 2013!November 24, 2012 at 3:36 pm #74587InactiveAccording toāNo.11-EDN(P) DATED 09/01/91
a) Minimum age for admission in class 1, 5 yrs but not exceed 7 years.
b) May be allowed if the student completed 5 yrs between 90 days of opening session.
According toāNo.380-EDN(P) DATED 31/07/91
a) Minimum age for admission in class 1, 5 yrs w.e.f.1991-1992.
with consideration of the above circulars the admission in class IX
According toāS/71 DATED 22/02/1999
a) Minimum age for admission in class IX, 13 yrs between 90 days of opening session.w.e.f.1999-2000
MAY -APRIL SESSION
No. S/343 dated 06/06/2000
For class IX-
Normal age 13 yrs.
According toā1330-SE(S)/8B-11/05 DATED 28/10/2005
Minimum age for admission in class IX, 13 yrs between 180 days of opening session.w.e.f.2005-2006
****** Relaxation power is given to WBBSE in right cases where applicable.
According toāDS(E)/89/06 dated 10/07/2006
candidates will be allowed in 2008 M.P. who were born between 31/10/1993. And also requested to all the schools not to send the name for enrollment whose date of birth after 31/10/1993. It will be strictly effect from the academic year 2006-2007.
Such way, the date of birth and age has been changed now and then. So, we can easily prove that, the age may considered by special permission.
Thank you.November 24, 2012 at 5:54 pm #74530InactiveDear friends,
A part of the Boardās Circular No. No. DS(E)/192/12 dated. 30.08.2012 regarding age for appearing at M.P. in 2014 is as follows:
āThe School authorities are requested not to send names of students whose date of birth is beyond 31st October, 1999. No Registration Certificates will be prepared if the date of birth of any candidate is beyond 31st October, 1999. The above order is strictly followed. āā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦..
Such way, the date of birth and age has been changed now and then. So, we can easily prove that, the age may considered by special permission.Now, if the School Authorities are asked for STRICT COMPLIANCE with the instructions and not to forward the names of the candidates with DOB beyond 31.10.1999 I donāt know how does the question of SPECIAL CONSIDERATION for age relaxation arise! How can the Board entertain the requests/recommendations of schools for some relaxation in the age criterion when it instructs the schools ānot to send names of students whose date of birth is beyond 31st October, 1999ā. There will be no parity between words and action! The phrases āStrict complianceā and āSpecial considerationā are contradictory to each other in this particular issue. There is no dispute that Board has the power for allowing relaxation of age of a candidate. Does it mean that Board does so every time in violation of itās own strictures! If so, what is the credibility of such Circular when it is repeatedly ignored by the Board itself in the event of special consideration!
In context of the query of Mr. Bhowmik it can be argued that if age relaxation to the extent of 2/3 months (and not 2/3 days) can be specially considered by the Board, then why canāt the same consideration be shown for relaxation of 5/6 months, or 8/9 months or 10/12 months! What is the extent of such special consideration? Whatās the importance of the Circular unless it is strictly followed? -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.