NILADRI

Calcutta High Court
The Hon’ble Justice Dipankar Datta
Born on February 9, 1965. Son of late Salil Kumar Datta, a former Judge of the High
Court at Calcutta, and brother-in-law of Justice Amitava Roy, Judge of the Gauhati
High Court. Awarded LL.B. degree by the University of Calcutta (First batch of 5 year
Law course) in 1989. Enrolled as an Advocate on November 16, 1989. Practised
mainly in the High Court at Calcutta, as well as in the Supreme Court of India and
other High Courts in Constitutional and Civil matters. Was the Junior Standing
Counsel for the State of West Bengal from May 16, 2002 to January 16, 2004. Was
Counsel for the Union of India since 1998. Appeared for a number of educational
authorities and institutions including the University of Calcutta, W.B. School Service
Commission and W.B. Board of Secondary Education. Was Guest Lecturer on
Constitutional Law of India in the University College of Law, University of Calcutta,
from 1996-97 to 1999-2000. Was elevated to the Bench of the High Court at Calcutta
as a permanent Judge on June 22, 2006.

SOURCE (CALCUTTA HIGH COURT WEBSITE)

26.11.2014
Item No.05
SB
W.P. 29606 (W) of 2014
With
W.P. 29607 (W) of 2014
With
W.P. 30510 (W) of 2014

Mr. B. R. Bhattacharya,
Mr. B. Banerjee,
Mr. S. Dasgupta…………………for the petitioners in
W.P. 29606 (W) of 2014,
W.P. 29607 (W) of 2014.
Ms. T. Roy ………….for the petitioners in
W.P. 30510 (W) of 2014.
Mr. A. Majumder,
Mr. T. K. Mukherjee,
Ms. C. Bhattacharya,
Mr. S. Dasgupta,
Mr. B. K. Mukherjee,
Mr. T. M. Siddique,
Mr. S. Dasgupta……………for the State.
Mr. E. Bari,
Syed M. Ali…………for the respondents 5 and 6 in
W.P. 29606 (W) of 2014,
W.P. 29607 (W) of 2014.
Ms. A. Gutgutia………..for the respondents 4 and 7 in
W.P. 29606 (W) of 2014,
W.P. 29607 (W) of 2014.
Mr. K. Bhattacharya,
Mr. S. K. Pal……………..for the respondents 5 and 6 in
W.P. 30510 (W) of 2014.
These writ petitions were being heard along with W.P. 27619 (W) of
2014. However, since the petitioners in W.P. 27619 (W) of 2014 have
expressed disinclination to proceed further with such writ petition, by a
separate order passed thereon I have directed de-tagging of all these
three writ petitions. 2
Since common questions of law and fact are involved, these three
writ petitions shall be heard together.
I have heard Mr. Majumder, learned Government Pleader appearing
for the State, who has concluded his argument.
Mr. Gupta, learned senior advocate for the Howrah District Primary
School Council has commenced his argument. Due to paucity of time,
he could not conclude today.
It is recorded that although the petitioners in W.P. 27619 (W) of
2014 (wherein the said Council is a respondent) may withdraw the same,
Mr. Gupta shall conclude his argument since certain important
questions of law are involved in all the writ petitions.
Put up these writ petitions on Wednesday next (03.12.2014).
Let appropriate advertisements be published by the respective writ
petitioners in ‘The Statesman’ and ‘Bartaman’/’Aajkal’ by Saturday next
notifying institution of all these writ petitions together with a gist of the
subject matter of challenge and indicating therein that this Court desires
interested parties, who might be affected by reason of any order being
passed on these writ petitions in favour of the petitioners, to contest the
same on the next date either appearing personally or through learned
advocate(s).
Let copies of this order duly counter-signed by the Assistant Court
Officer, be retained with the records of W.P. 29607 (W) of 2014 and W.P.
30510 (W) of 2014.
(DIPANKAR DATTA, J.)

2009 er PRIMARY EXAM NIE NORTH 24 PARGANA AGAINST E J CASE FILE HOYECHILO..
TAR 1st HEARING DATE 20/11/14 AT CALCUTTA HIGH COURT